Office Space

Office Space is a great movie. Michael, Peter and Samir are the subordinates of their boss Lumberg. Lumbergs Leadership traits are peculiar to say the least. However, these traits do fit into the Hershey-Blanchard situational model of Leadership. This particular model suggests that leaders need to alter their Leadership styles depending on the willingness of their followers to carry out in a given situation.

In applying the Hershey and B lanchard model it is seen that Lumberg uses a telling relationship with his employees. A telling relationship is one in which the supervisor would give specific task directions and closely oversee the work of his employees. This kind of relationship is one of guidance and support. People using this style believe that their employees are not capable and reluctant to perform tasks given to them.

This kind of relationship can first of all be seen in how Lumberg criticizes everything any of his employees do incorrect. When Peter forgets to put a cover letter on his TPS reports Lumberg tells him what he has done wrong on a several of occasions while hanging over his desk. The low level of relationship can be seen in that he does not listen to what Peter has to say about the situation but just goes on telling him about his mistake and how he can correct that. This also shows that he believes that Peter does not know how to do his job.

The telling relationship Lu mberg has with his employees can also be seen in that he does not take their suggestions or ask for them for that matter. Instead, Lumberg just gives orders and expects them to be followed. Thus, he is giving guidance to people instead of getting their contribution on anything. In most cases, these Peter, Michael and Samir do not need his supervision because they know their job and would feel more comfy if they were just left alone to do it.

Lumberg does not support his workers but just profoundly supervises them. When Peter needs a break and makes up his mind to stay home on a Saturday Lumberg just continues calling him to tell him to come to work. Peter does not have any power to make decisions on his own but is just continually supervised. This can also be seen in how Lumberg is always watching his employees, criticizing them and asking questions about how their work is coming.

Certainly, he telling style of Leadership used by Lumberg was not correct. Peter, Michael and Samir are employees that are very knowledgeable and who need very little control. Thus, Lumberg should have chosen more of a diligent Leadership style than he did. This kind of style allows the group to make and be conscientiousness for task decisions. After being told what to do they can do it on their own without much supervision or support. They are all able, willing and confident employees who, if they didnt feel like they were always being watched, would probably enjoy their job more and thus be more productive and do better work.

In conclusion, Lumberg used a telling Leadership style with his subordinates when he should have used something more like the delegating style. This hands-off approach would allow workers to be more positive and do a better job. It would also help in his workers not resenting him so much because of his continuous control.

The article was produced by the writer of masterpapers.com. Sharon White has many years of a vast experience in Accounting Dissertation writing and Adolescent Essay consulting. Get free samples of essays, courseworks and advertising dissertation.

Author:: Sharon White
Keywords:: Office, Leadership
Post by History of the Computer | Computer safety tips